Re: [PATCH v3 12/18] xen/pvcalls: implement poll command

From: Juergen Gross
Date: Tue Jun 13 2017 - 03:28:23 EST


On 02/06/17 21:31, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Implement poll on passive sockets by requesting a delayed response with
> mappass->reqcopy, and reply back when there is data on the passive
> socket.
>
> Poll on active socket is unimplemented as by the spec, as the frontend
> should just wait for events and check the indexes on the indexes page.
>
> Only support one outstanding poll (or accept) request for every passive
> socket at any given time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx
> CC: jgross@xxxxxxxx
> ---
> drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c
> index f1173f4..82f350d 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c
> @@ -344,11 +344,33 @@ static void __pvcalls_back_accept(struct work_struct *work)
> static void pvcalls_pass_sk_data_ready(struct sock *sock)
> {
> struct sockpass_mapping *mappass = sock->sk_user_data;
> + struct pvcalls_fedata *priv;
> + struct xen_pvcalls_response *rsp;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int notify;
>
> if (mappass == NULL)
> return;
>
> - queue_work(mappass->wq, &mappass->register_work);
> + priv = mappass->priv;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&mappass->copy_lock, flags);
> + if (mappass->reqcopy.cmd == PVCALLS_POLL) {
> + rsp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&priv->ring, priv->ring.rsp_prod_pvt++);
> + rsp->req_id = mappass->reqcopy.req_id;
> + rsp->u.poll.id = mappass->reqcopy.u.poll.id;
> + rsp->cmd = mappass->reqcopy.cmd;
> + rsp->ret = 0;
> +
> + mappass->reqcopy.cmd = 0;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mappass->copy_lock, flags);
> +
> + RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&priv->ring, notify);
> + if (notify)
> + notify_remote_via_irq(mappass->priv->irq);
> + } else {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mappass->copy_lock, flags);
> + queue_work(mappass->wq, &mappass->register_work);
> + }
> }
>
> static int pvcalls_back_bind(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> @@ -493,7 +515,56 @@ static int pvcalls_back_accept(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> static int pvcalls_back_poll(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> struct xen_pvcalls_request *req)
> {
> - return 0;
> + struct pvcalls_fedata *priv;
> + struct sockpass_mapping *mappass;
> + struct xen_pvcalls_response *rsp;
> + struct inet_connection_sock *icsk;
> + struct request_sock_queue *queue;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int ret;
> + bool data;
> +
> + priv = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
> +
> + mappass = radix_tree_lookup(&priv->socketpass_mappings, req->u.poll.id);
> + if (mappass == NULL)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Limitation of the current implementation: only support one
> + * concurrent accept or poll call on one socket.
> + */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&mappass->copy_lock, flags);
> + if (mappass->reqcopy.cmd != 0) {
> + ret = -EINTR;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + mappass->reqcopy = *req;
> + icsk = inet_csk(mappass->sock->sk);
> + queue = &icsk->icsk_accept_queue;
> + spin_lock(&queue->rskq_lock);
> + data = queue->rskq_accept_head != NULL;
> + spin_unlock(&queue->rskq_lock);
> + if (data) {
> + mappass->reqcopy.cmd = 0;
> + ret = 0;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mappass->copy_lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Tell the caller we don't need to send back a notification yet */
> + return -1;
> +
> +out:
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mappass->copy_lock, flags);
> +
> + rsp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&priv->ring, priv->ring.rsp_prod_pvt++);
> + rsp->req_id = req->req_id;
> + rsp->cmd = req->cmd;
> + rsp->u.poll.id = req->u.poll.id;
> + rsp->ret = ret;
> + return ret;

return 0;


Juergen

> }
>
> static int pvcalls_back_handle_cmd(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>