Re: [PATCH 5/5] power: supply: bq27xxx: Correct supply status with current draw

[Sebastian Reichel]

Hi,

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:16:01AM +0300, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Le jeudi 08 juin 2017 à 21:27 +0200, Sebastian Reichel a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 01:08:52PM +0300, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 09:52 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > > > [0]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.
> > > > > > > git/
> > > > > > > comm
> > > > > > > it/?
> > > > > > > h=v4.12-rc4&id=7f93e1fa032bb5ee19b868b9649bc98c82553003
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Is there some documentation that explains what different power supply
> > > > > > statuses mean? Because without that, we can have long and useless
> > > > > > discussions.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Well, I couldn't really find much except the following from
> > > > > Documentation/
> > > > > (which is not that helpful, and the BATTERY_STATUS_* don't seem to exist
> > > > > anymore):
> > > > > 
> > > > > " STATUS - this attribute represents operating status (charging, full,
> > > > > discharging (i.e. powering a load), etc.). This corresponds to
> > > > > BATTERY_STATUS_* values, as defined in battery.h. "
> > > > > 
> > > > > Generally speaking, I think the question to be asked is what information
> > > > > users
> > > > > will be interested in in each scenario we have to consider.
> > > > 
> > > > Hmm. We really should add some documentation :-(.
> > > 
> > > Maybe we should start a new thread about this to give it more visibility.
> > > That way, PM maintainers could weigh-in and share thoughts.
> > > 
> > > I definitely agree there is a need to clarify what we want to report to
> > > userspace given the various scenarios we've been discussing.
> > 
> > +1 for extension and update of documentation. If its known, that
> > the battery is trickle charged, it should report FULL. No need
> > to annoy people by constantly updating the status. Think of it
> > being mapped directly to a status LED. Of course the CURRENT/ENERGY
> > properties should still be updated, so that anyone interested in
> > the details can see them.
> 
> Agreed. Do ou think there is a need to start a specific discussion about
> various scenarios and how to handle them or do shall we just use common sense
> here?

I suggest to use common sense and if anything is unclear send a
documentation patch, so that we have a basis for discussion.

-- Sebastian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature