Re: [PATCH v6 25/34] swiotlb: Add warnings for use of bounce buffers with SME

[Borislav Petkov]

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:49:02PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> I guess I don't need the sme_active() check since the second part of the
> if statement can only ever be true if SME is active (since mask is
> unsigned).

... and you can define sme_me_mask as an u64 directly (it is that already,
practically, as we don't do SME on 32-bit) and then get rid of the cast.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.