Re: [PATCH 11/14] mm, memory_hotplug: do not associate hotadded memory to zones until online

From: Wei Yang
Date: Fri Jun 16 2017 - 05:11:27 EST


On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:45:55AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Fri 16-06-17 16:11:42, Wei Yang wrote:
>> Well, I love this patch a lot. We don't need to put the hotadd memory in one
>> zone and move it to another. This looks great!
>>
>> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:58:24AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> >From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> [...]
>> +
>> >+void move_pfn_range_to_zone(struct zone *zone,
>> >+ unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
>> >+{
>> >+ struct pglist_data *pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
>> >+ int nid = pgdat->node_id;
>> >+ unsigned long flags;
>> >+ unsigned long i;
>> >+
>> >+ if (zone_is_empty(zone))
>> >+ init_currently_empty_zone(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>> >+
>> >+ clear_zone_contiguous(zone);
>> >+
>> >+ /* TODO Huh pgdat is irqsave while zone is not. It used to be like that before */
>> >+ pgdat_resize_lock(pgdat, &flags);
>> >+ zone_span_writelock(zone);
>> >+ resize_zone_range(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>> >+ zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
>> >+ resize_pgdat_range(pgdat, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>> >+ pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags);
>> >+
>> >+ /*
>> >+ * TODO now we have a visible range of pages which are not associated
>> >+ * with their zone properly. Not nice but set_pfnblock_flags_mask
>> >+ * expects the zone spans the pfn range. All the pages in the range
>> >+ * are reserved so nobody should be touching them so we should be safe
>> >+ */
>> >+ memmap_init_zone(nr_pages, nid, zone_idx(zone), start_pfn, MEMMAP_HOTPLUG);
>> >+ for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
>> >+ unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i;
>> >+ set_page_links(pfn_to_page(pfn), zone_idx(zone), nid, pfn);
>> > }
>>
>> memmap_init_zone()->__init_single_page()->set_page_links()
>>
>> Do I miss something that you call set_page_links() explicitly here?
>
>I guess you are right. Not sure why I've done this explicitly. I've most
>probably just missed that. Could you post a patch that removes the for
>loop.
>

Sure, I will come up with two patches based on you auto-latest branch.

>Thanks!
>--
>Michal Hocko
>SUSE Labs

--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature