Re: perf report: fix off-by-one for non-activation frames
From: Milian Wolff
Date: Sat Jun 17 2017 - 07:13:27 EST
On Samstag, 17. Juni 2017 10:04:02 CEST Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2017 09:56:57 +0200, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Not sure whether it needs be fixed or not. If we fix it, srcline and
> > address would not match so it can give its own confusion to users.
> > Ideally it should display an addressof the instruction before the
> > address IMHO.
> One can figure million ways how it can behave and each one has its pros and
> cons. I was just describing the current behavior of GDB and LLDB which
> people are used to already.
Personally, I agree with Jan that we should mimick existing tool's behavior. I
just fear that it's not trivial to do it with the current code base...
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff@xxxxxxxx | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
KDAB - The Qt Experts