Re: [PATCH v4 12/18] xen/pvcalls: implement poll command

[Boris Ostrovsky]

> @@ -499,6 +521,55 @@ static int pvcalls_back_accept(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>  static int pvcalls_back_poll(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>  			     struct xen_pvcalls_request *req)
>  {
> +	struct pvcalls_fedata *fedata;
> +	struct sockpass_mapping *mappass;
> +	struct xen_pvcalls_response *rsp;
> +	struct inet_connection_sock *icsk;
> +	struct request_sock_queue *queue;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int ret;
> +	bool data;
> +
> +	fedata = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
> +
> +	mappass = radix_tree_lookup(&fedata->socketpass_mappings, req->u.poll.id);
> +	if (mappass == NULL)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Limitation of the current implementation: only support one
> +	 * concurrent accept or poll call on one socket.
> +	 */
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&mappass->copy_lock, flags);
> +	if (mappass->reqcopy.cmd != 0) {
> +		ret = -EINTR;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	mappass->reqcopy = *req;
> +	icsk = inet_csk(mappass->sock->sk);
> +	queue = &icsk->icsk_accept_queue;
> +	spin_lock(&queue->rskq_lock);
> +	data = queue->rskq_accept_head != NULL;
> +	spin_unlock(&queue->rskq_lock);

What is the purpose of the queue lock here?

-boris

> +	if (data) {
> +		mappass->reqcopy.cmd = 0;
> +		ret = 0;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mappass->copy_lock, flags);
> +
> +	/* Tell the caller we don't need to send back a notification yet */
> +	return -1;
>