Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for the ICU unit in Marvell Armada 7K/8K

From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Wed Jun 21 2017 - 12:23:17 EST


On 21/06/17 16:42, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Marc and Thomas,
>
> On mer., juin 21 2017, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:14:21 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>
>>>> Thomas Petazzoni (6):
>>>> dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for the Marvell GICP
>>>> dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for the Marvell ICU
>>>> irqchip: irq-mvebu-gicp: new driver for Marvell GICP
>>>> irqchip: irq-mvebu-icu: new driver for Marvell ICU
>>>> arm64: marvell: enable ICU and GICP drivers
>>>> arm64: dts: marvell: enable GICP and ICU on Armada 7K/8K
>>>>
>>>> .../bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,gicp.txt | 27 ++
>>>> .../bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,icu.txt | 51 ++++
>>>> arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 2 +
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi | 7 +
>>>> .../boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-master.dtsi | 59 +++--
>>>> .../arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110-slave.dtsi | 55 ++--
>>>> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 6 +
>>>> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 +
>>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c | 279 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h | 12 +
>>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c | 289 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> .../dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h | 15 ++
>>>> 12 files changed, 756 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,gicp.txt
>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/marvell,icu.txt
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.h
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c
>>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h
>>>>
>>>
>>> It all looks good to me. How do we merge this? I take the first five
>>> patches and Gregory takes the last one?
>>
>> I think you should take the first four patches, and GrÃgory takes the
>> last two ones. But I'll let GrÃgory confirm.
>
> Indeed it makes more sens to merge the patch 4 through the arm-soc
> subsystem.

Hmmm. You mean patches 5 and 6, right? And I queue 1 to 4?

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...