Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] rtc: make st-lpc robust against y2038/2106 bug
From: Alexandre Belloni
Date: Fri Jun 23 2017 - 18:11:23 EST
On 23/06/2017 at 13:40:41 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 06/19/2017 03:36 AM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> > On 32bits platforms "struct timeval" or "time_t" are using u32 to code the
> > date, this cause tools like "date" or "hwclock" failed even before setting
> > the RTC device if the date is superior to year 2038 (or 2106).
> > To avoid this problem I add one RTC test file which directly use RTC ioctl
> > to set and read RTC time and alarm values.
> > rtctest_setdate allow to set any date/time given in the command line.
> > On this version 2 I add check of problematics years in rtctest like suggest
> > by Alexandre.
> > Finally that had allowed me to test and fix rtc-st-lpc driver.
> > Benjamin Gaignard (3):
> > tools: timer: add rtctest_setdate
> > tool: timer: rtctest add check for problematic dates
> > rtc: st-lpc: make it robust against y2038/2106 bug
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-st-lpc.c | 19 ++--
> > tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile | 2 +-
> > tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c
> Hi Thomas/John,
> I can take the first two patches in this series through linux-kselftest
> with your or John's Ack. Please review and let me know one way or the
Well, I'm the maintainer for rtctest.c and I'll make sure to also be the
one for rtctest_setdate.c.
> The third one is a rtc driver patch. Please let me know how do you want
> to handle this series soon we can get this into 4.13-rc1.
I'll take the three patches but I still have comment I didn't have time
to give yet.
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering