Re: Question regarding MAX_ARG_STRLEN with execve()
From: Anshuman Khandual
Date: Mon Jul 03 2017 - 04:29:17 EST
On 06/30/2017 07:52 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 30-06-17 11:59:37, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> execve() system call should support argument length of
>> MAX_ARG_STRLEN (PAGE_SIZE * 32). On 64K page size systems, we
>> are not able to pass 32 * PAGE_SIZE arguments into the execve()
>> system call because of the following reasons.
>> * struct linux_binprm's vma starts with a size of PAGE_SIZE
>> vma->vm_end = STACK_TOP_MAX;
>> vma->vm_start = vma->vm_end - PAGE_SIZE;
>> * The VMA expands as much depending upon the argument size. So
>> for 32 * PAGE_SIZE argument, it becomes 33 * PAGE_SIZE.
>> * 33 * PAGE_SIZE with 64K pages fails the following test in
>> get_arg_page() function. 33 * PAGE_SIZE is more than 2MB
>> (8 MB /4) with 64K page size.
>> if (size > READ_ONCE(rlim[RLIMIT_STACK].rlim_cur) / 4)
>> * Right now RLIMIT_STACK is hard coded 8MB which does not take
>> PAGE_SIZE into account.
>> Wondering what should be the solution for this problem ?
>> * Change the default stack size from 8MB ?
> just increase the ulimit if you want to use such a large arguments.
Yeah that is possible but it does not still offset the fact that
the calculation is broken on the page size of 64K. I mean, yeah
its not practical to have such a large argument. But the point
is whether we would want to support the MAX_ARG_STRLEN semantic
for execve system call or not. At present its broken for 64K
and I am asking whether we will be willing to revisit the
'1/4th of the stack' condition.