Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] perf report: Implement visual marker for macro fusion in annotate

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Fri Jul 07 2017 - 10:51:26 EST


Em Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:06:35PM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
> For marking the fused instructions clearly, This patch adds a line
> before the first instruction of pair and joins it with the arrow of the
> jump.
>
> For example, when je is selected in annotate view, the line before cmpl
> is displayed and joins the arrow of je.
>
> â âââcmpl $0x0,argp_program_version_hook
> 81.93 â âââje 20
> â â lock cmpxchg %esi,0x38a9a4(%rip)
> â ââ jne 29
> â ââ jmp 43
> 11.47 â20:âââcmpxch %esi,0x38a999(%rip)
>
> That means the cmpl+je is fused instruction pair and they should be
> considered together.

I applied this one, no unnecessary parsing of cpuid done at each
jump->target arrow rendering, much better, thanks!

One thing for a follow up patch:

We have this when the cursor is at a jump instruction:

â âââtest %ecx,%ecx
-> â âââje 714cf
â â mov LINES+0xb40,%edx
â â test %edx,%edx
â ââ je 71580
â714cf:âââmov LINES+0x10c8,%eax

But if we go up a line, to that "test" instruction, we get:

-> â test %ecx,%ecx
â â je 714cf
â mov LINES+0xb40,%edx
â test %edx,%edx
â â je 71580
â714cf: mov LINES+0x10c8,%eax

I suggest that this be changed to:

-> â ââtest %ecx,%ecx
â â je 714cf
â mov LINES+0xb40,%edx
â test %edx,%edx
â â je 71580
â714cf: mov LINES+0x10c8,%eax

I.e. even before going to the jump instruction line with the cursor, we
would see the fused instructions.

To do that perhaps we should improve annotate_browser__draw_current_jump
to improve that part that looks for is_valid_jump() to consider
instructions that could be fused with jumps for the machine where the
perf data came from, etc.

But the current situation is better already, thanks for your work,
applied!

- Arnaldo