Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Staging: Lustre Fix block statement style issue

From: Craig Inches
Date: Mon Jul 17 2017 - 13:50:33 EST


On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:44:59PM +0000, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2017, at 03:03, Craig Inches <craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This fixes a block statement which didnt end with */
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Craig Inches <Craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > index dd5bc0e46560..a1ae66ede7a8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > @@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ struct ksock_msg {
> > __u64 ksm_zc_cookies[2]; /* Zero-Copy request/ACK cookie */
> > union {
> > struct ksock_lnet_msg lnetmsg; /* lnet message, it's empty if
> > - * it's NOOP */
> > + * it's NOOP
> > + */
>
> Rather than making the multi-line comments even more space consuming (I'm not a big
> fan of "*/ must be on a line by itself" since it wastes a lot of vertical space),
> I'd prefer to just shorten the comment, if possible, like:
>
> struct ksock_lnet_msg lnetmsg; /* lnet message, empty if NOOP */

That makes sense, I believe the series has already made it to
staging-next, so not sure what the process would be to fix it up.

I am doing another set of style fixes which I can include this change
aswell.

Cheers,

Craig