Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Update last_update from sugov_set_iowait_boost()

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Tue Jul 18 2017 - 07:26:00 EST


On 18-07-17, 12:20, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
>
> On 18/07/17 10:24, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > sg_cpu->last_update is always updated right after we call
> > sugov_set_iowait_boost() and its better to update it from that routine
> > itself. This makes it more readable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > index 29a397067ffa..63557b9f36b6 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > @@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ static void sugov_set_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
> > if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC)
> > sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
> > }
> > +
> > + sg_cpu->last_update = time;
> > }
> >
> > static void sugov_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, unsigned long *util,
> > @@ -219,7 +221,6 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
> > bool busy;
> >
> > sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
> > - sg_cpu->last_update = time;
> >
> > if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time))
> > return;
> > @@ -299,7 +300,6 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
> > sg_cpu->flags = flags;
> >
> > sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
> > - sg_cpu->last_update = time;
>
> It actually belongs here, IMHO. We update other fields (util, max,
> flags)

Yeah, because they have bigger roles and aren't specific to iowait
boost.

> before looking at iowait. Why hiding the time update into a
> function dealing with only one of such fields?

But last_update is very much specific to iowait_boost only and so it
should be updated from sugov_set_iowait_boost() IMHO.

--
viresh