Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] net-next: dsa: fix flow dissection

From: John Crispin
Date: Fri Jul 28 2017 - 15:41:06 EST




On 26/07/17 17:10, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:58:12AM +0200, John Crispin wrote:
RPS and probably other kernel features are currently broken on some if not
all DSA devices. The root cause of this is that skb_hash will call the
flow_dissector. At this point the skb still contains the magic switch header
and the skb->protocol field is not set up to the correct 802.3 value yet.
By the time the tag specific code is called, removing the header and
properly setting the protocol an invalid hash is already set. In the case
of the mt7530 this will result in all flows always having the same hash.

This patch makes the flow dissector honour the nh and protocol offset
defined by the dsa tag driver thus fixing dissection, hashing and RPS.

Signed-off-by: John Crispin <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/core/flow_dissector.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
index fc5fc4594c90..1268ae75c3b3 100644
--- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
+++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <linux/ip.h>
#include <linux/ipv6.h>
#include <linux/if_vlan.h>
+#include <net/dsa.h>
#include <net/ip.h>
#include <net/ipv6.h>
#include <net/gre.h>
@@ -440,6 +441,17 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct sk_buff *skb,
skb->vlan_proto : skb->protocol;
nhoff = skb_network_offset(skb);
hlen = skb_headlen(skb);
+
+ if (unlikely(netdev_uses_dsa(skb->dev))) {
+ const struct dsa_device_ops *ops;
+ u8 *p = (u8 *)data;
+
+ ops = skb->dev->dsa_ptr->tag_ops;
+ if (ops->hash_proto_off)
+ proto = (u16)p[ops->hash_proto_off];
Hi John

Unfortunately, this is not generic enough to work for DSA and EDSA
tagging. With these tagging protocols, the size of the tag depends on
the presence or not of a VLAN header.

To make this work for all tagging protocols, we are going to need to
add an a new op to tag_ops.

Andrew
Hi Andrew,

thanks for the feedback. should I add 2 callbacks for each of the 2 parameters ?

John