Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm: Widen vblank UAPI to 64 bits. Change vblank time to ktime_t [v2]
From: Michel DÃnzer
Date: Wed Aug 02 2017 - 05:41:37 EST
On 02/08/17 05:53 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:03:04PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
>> This modifies the datatypes used by the vblank code to provide both 64
>> bits of vblank count and switch to using ktime_t for timestamps to
>> increase resolution from microseconds to nanoseconds.
>> The driver interfaces have been left using 32 bits of vblank count;
>> all of the code necessary to widen that value for the user API was
>> already included to handle devices returning fewer than 32-bits.
>> This will provide the necessary datatypes for the Vulkan API.
>> * Re-write wait_vblank ioctl to ABSOLUTE sequence
>> When an application uses the WAIT_VBLANK ioctl with RELATIVE
>> or NEXTONMISS bits set, the target vblank interval is updated
>> within the kernel. We need to write that target back to the
>> ioctl buffer and update the flags bits so that if the wait is
>> interrupted by a signal, when it is re-started, it will target
>> precisely the same vblank count as before.
>> * Leave driver API with 32-bit vblank count
>> Suggested-by: Michel DÃnzer <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject is a bit confusing since you say uapi, but this is just the
> internal prep work. Dropping UAPI fixes that. With that fixed:
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> Two more optional comments below, feel free to adapt or ignore. I'll wait
> for Michel's r-b before merging either way.
I don't think changing max_vblank_count to u64 is necessary/useful;
other than that, AFAICT the issues I raised before for this patch have
been addressed. I'm afraid I don't know if/when I'll get a chance to
review the whole patch in detail though.
Earthling Michel DÃnzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer