Re: [PATCH 1/3] autofs - fix AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT not being honored

[Ian Kent]

On 09/08/17 16:39, David Howells wrote:
> Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> In order to handle the AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT for both system calls the
>> negative dentry case in follow_automount() needs to be changed to
>> return ENOENT when the LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT flag is clear (and the other
>> required flags are clear).
> 
> Should the be EREMOTE instead of ENOENT?

I thought about that and ended up thinking ENOENT was more sensible
but I'll look at it again.

Thanks
Ian