Re: [PATCH] i2c: slave-eeprom: Add an OF device ID table

[Wolfram Sang]

> What kind of change are you looking for? The example was introduced by commit
> 04606ccc84e3 ("i2c: designware: introducing I2C_SLAVE definitions") that says:
> 
> - A example was added to designware-core.txt Documentation that shows
>   how the slave can be setup using DTS

My fault, I missed it :(

> So I could change this example to instead use a real EEPROM compatible (e.g:
> "microchip,24c02") instead of "linux,slave-24c02". Would that be correct?

I think this is Luis call how he'd like this to be changed. Given the
current discussion, I'd think it must be dropped entirely.

Luis?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature