Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] PCI: rockchip: Add support for pcie wake irq

From: jeffy
Date: Wed Aug 16 2017 - 20:25:43 EST


hi shawn,


On 08/16/2017 05:00 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
Hi Jeffy,

On 2017/8/16 15:52, Jeffy Chen wrote:
Add support for PCIE_WAKE pin in rockchip pcie driver.

Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c | 58
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c
b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c
index 7bb9870f6d8c..f969a6d3cd85 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/reset.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/suspend.h>
/*
* The upper 16 bits of PCIE_CLIENT_CONFIG are a write mask for the
lower 16
@@ -226,6 +227,8 @@ struct rockchip_pcie {
struct regulator *vpcie1v8; /* 1.8V power supply */
struct regulator *vpcie0v9; /* 0.9V power supply */
struct gpio_desc *ep_gpio;
+ int wake_irq;
+ bool wake_by_pcie;
u32 lanes;
u8 root_bus_nr;
int link_gen;
@@ -853,6 +856,20 @@ static void
rockchip_pcie_legacy_int_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
}
+static irqreturn_t rockchip_pcie_wake_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
+{
+ struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = arg;
+
+ rockchip->wake_by_pcie = true;
+
+ disable_irq_nosync(rockchip->wake_irq);
+ disable_irq_wake(rockchip->wake_irq);
+
+ pm_wakeup_event(rockchip->dev, 0);
+ pm_system_wakeup();
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
/**
* rockchip_pcie_parse_dt - Parse Device Tree
@@ -868,6 +885,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_parse_dt(struct
rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
struct resource *regs;
int irq;
int err;
+ bool wakeup = 0;
regs = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
IORESOURCE_MEM,
@@ -1018,6 +1036,21 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_parse_dt(struct
rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
return err;
}
+ rockchip->wake_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "wake");
+ if (rockchip->wake_irq >= 0) {
+ err = devm_request_irq(dev, rockchip->wake_irq,
+ rockchip_pcie_wake_irq_handler,
+ 0, "pcie-wake", rockchip);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to request PCIe wake IRQ\n");
+ return err;

This is optional, so I'm not sure if we should prevent the driver to
probe?
it would only break probe when there's a wake irq, but failed to enable it. but the wake irq itself is optional

+ }
+
+ disable_irq(rockchip->wake_irq);
+ wakeup = device_property_read_bool(dev, "wakeup-source");

The purpose we add this, is for ep to wakeup the system, so why not
always treate it as a wakeup source.
it's an extra option to disable wake by wakeup-source property

+ }
+ device_init_wakeup(dev, wakeup);
+
rockchip->vpcie3v3 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie3v3");
if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3)) {
if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
@@ -1270,6 +1303,30 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_wait_l2(struct
rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
return 0;
}
+static int __maybe_unused rockchip_pcie_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ rockchip->wake_by_pcie = false;
+
+ if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
+ enable_irq_wake(rockchip->wake_irq);
+ enable_irq(rockchip->wake_irq);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __maybe_unused rockchip_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ if (device_may_wakeup(dev) && !rockchip->wake_by_pcie) {

I don't get this that why we need to check wake_by_pcie here?

it's to avoid double disable when it got a irq before resume
+ disable_irq(rockchip->wake_irq);
+ disable_irq_wake(rockchip->wake_irq);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int __maybe_unused rockchip_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device
*dev)
{
struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -1548,6 +1605,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_remove(struct
platform_device *pdev)
}
static const struct dev_pm_ops rockchip_pcie_pm_ops = {
+ SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(rockchip_pcie_suspend, rockchip_pcie_resume)
SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(rockchip_pcie_suspend_noirq,
rockchip_pcie_resume_noirq)
};