Re: [PATCH v4] bcache: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API

[Coly Li]

On 2017/8/18 äå9:24, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 01:42:23PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
>> Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used.
> 
> Any opinions about this?
> 

The patch is good. If Eric has no time, I will take care of it later.

Thanks.

Coly

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/md/bcache/closure.c | 15 ++-------------
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c
>> index 864e673..7d5286b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c
>> @@ -70,21 +70,10 @@ void __closure_wake_up(struct closure_waitlist *wait_list)
>>  	list = llist_del_all(&wait_list->list);
>>  
>>  	/* We first reverse the list to preserve FIFO ordering and fairness */
>> -
>> -	while (list) {
>> -		struct llist_node *t = list;
>> -		list = llist_next(list);
>> -
>> -		t->next = reverse;
>> -		reverse = t;
>> -	}
>> +	reverse = llist_reverse_order(list);
>>  
>>  	/* Then do the wakeups */
>> -
>> -	while (reverse) {
>> -		cl = container_of(reverse, struct closure, list);
>> -		reverse = llist_next(reverse);
>> -
>> +	llist_for_each_entry(cl, reverse, list) {
>>  		closure_set_waiting(cl, 0);
>>  		closure_sub(cl, CLOSURE_WAITING + 1);
>>  	}
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1