Re: [PATCH 5/5] Use __func__ instead of function name

From: êëí
Date: Sat Aug 19 2017 - 04:07:09 EST


I guess below code would be better idea to gather more debug information.
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index 643bba7..0aae785 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip
*chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
return -EIO;
}

+ if (!buf) {
+ dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "%s buf null at %d \n",__func__,
rc, __LINE__);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
spin_lock(&ibmvtpm->rtce_lock);
memcpy((void *)ibmvtpm->rtce_buf, (void *)buf, count);
crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
@@ -150,8 +155,9 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip,
u8 *buf, size_t count)

rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, be64_to_cpu(word[0]),
be64_to_cpu(word[1]));
+
if (rc != H_SUCCESS) {
- dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "tpm_ibmvtpm_send failed rc=%d\n", rc);
+ dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "%s failed rc=%d at %d
\n",__func__, rc, __LINE__);
rc = 0;
} else
rc = count;

2017-07-29 16:24 GMT+09:00 SZ Lin <sz.lin@xxxxxxxx>:
> Fix following checkpatch.pl warning:
> WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using
> the function's name, in a string
>
> Signed-off-by: SZ Lin <sz.lin@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> index e75a674b44ac..2d33acc43e25 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
> rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, be64_to_cpu(word[0]),
> be64_to_cpu(word[1]));
> if (rc != H_SUCCESS) {
> - dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "tpm_ibmvtpm_send failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> + dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
> rc = 0;
> ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd = false;
> } else
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
> cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
> if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> - "ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> + "%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
>
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_version(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
> cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
> if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> - "ibmvtpm_crq_get_version failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> + "%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
>
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static int ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
> rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_COMP_CMD, 0);
> if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> - "ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> + "%s rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
>
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int ibmvtpm_crq_send_init(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
> rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_CMD, 0);
> if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> - "ibmvtpm_crq_send_init failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> + "%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
>
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
> if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> - "tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> + "%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
>
> return rc;
> }
> --
> 2.13.3
>