Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Make bpf_util work on uniprocessor systems

From: Alexei Starovoitov
Date: Fri Sep 08 2017 - 19:02:20 EST


On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 01:19:23PM +0200, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> The current implementation fails to work on uniprocessor systems.
> Fix the parser to also handle the uniprocessor case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@xxxxxxxx>

Thanks for the fix. lgtm
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>

This time it's ok to go via selftest tree, but next time please use net-next/net
to avoid conflicts.
Thanks

> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h
> index 20ecbaa0d85d..6c53a8906eff 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ static inline unsigned int bpf_num_possible_cpus(void)
> unsigned int start, end, possible_cpus = 0;
> char buff[128];
> FILE *fp;
> + int n;
>
> fp = fopen(fcpu, "r");
> if (!fp) {
> @@ -20,17 +21,17 @@ static inline unsigned int bpf_num_possible_cpus(void)
> }
>
> while (fgets(buff, sizeof(buff), fp)) {
> - if (sscanf(buff, "%u-%u", &start, &end) == 2) {
> - possible_cpus = start == 0 ? end + 1 : 0;
> - break;
> + n = sscanf(buff, "%u-%u", &start, &end);
> + if (n == 0) {
> + printf("Failed to retrieve # possible CPUs!\n");
> + exit(1);
> + } else if (n == 1) {
> + end = start;
> }
> + possible_cpus = start == 0 ? end + 1 : 0;
> + break;
> }
> -
> fclose(fp);
> - if (!possible_cpus) {
> - printf("Failed to retrieve # possible CPUs!\n");
> - exit(1);
> - }
>
> return possible_cpus;
> }
> --
> 2.11.0
>