Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] arm-smmu: performance optimization

From: Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Date: Tue Sep 19 2017 - 02:28:48 EST




On 2017/9/19 12:31, Nate Watterson wrote:
> Hi Leizhen,
>
> On 9/12/2017 9:00 AM, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> v1 -> v2:
>> base on (add02cfdc9bc2 "iommu: Introduce Interface for IOMMU TLB Flushing")
>>
>> Zhen Lei (3):
>> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: put off the execution of TLBI* to reduce lock
>> confliction
>> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: add support for unmap an iova range with only one
>> tlb sync
>
> I tested these (2) patches on QDF2400 hardware and saw performance
> improvements in line with those I reported when testing the original
> series. I don't have any hardware close at hand to test the 3rd patch
> in the series so that will have to come from someone else.
Thanks a lot.

>
> Tested-by: Nate Watterson <nwatters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks,
> Nate
>
>> iommu/arm-smmu: add support for unmap a memory range with only one tlb
>> sync
>>
>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 10 ++++++++
>> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c | 32 +++++++++++++++--------
>> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 30 ++++++++++++++--------
>> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h | 1 +
>> 5 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>

--
Thanks!
BestRegards