Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: dt-platdev: Add devices covered by ti-cpufreq to blacklist

From: Dave Gerlach
Date: Tue Sep 19 2017 - 11:09:31 EST


On 09/19/2017 10:02 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 19 September 2017 at 07:57, Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> Commit edeec420de24 ("cpufreq: dt-platdev: Automatically create cpufreq
>> device with OPP v2") causes a cpufreq-dt platform device to be
>> automatically created for any platform with an OPP v2 node defined.
>> However, ti-cpufreq registers the cpufreq-dt platdev at the end of probe
>> in order to ensure the ti-cpufreq driver probes first and provides the
>> necessary opp-supported-hw for cpufreq-dt. With this new patch now a
>> dupluicate cpufreq-dt is created, which we do not want. To avoid this,
>> add the platforms handled by ti-cpufreq to the blacklist provided in the
>> aforementioned commit to allow ti-cpufreq to continue creating the
>> cpufreq-dt platdev.
>>
>> This applies to am335x, am437x, dra7xx, and am57xx.
>>
>> Fixes: edeec420de24 ("cpufreq: dt-cpufreq: platdev Automatically create device with OPP v2")
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
>> index a020da7940d6..c6f554ba9bb3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
>> @@ -106,6 +106,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id whitelist[] __initconst = {
>> * platforms using "operating-points-v2" property.
>> */
>> static const struct of_device_id blacklist[] __initconst = {
>> + { .compatible = "ti,am33xx", },
>> + { .compatible = "ti,am43", },
>> + { .compatible = "ti,dra7", },
>> +
>> { }
>> };
>
> Perhaps you should ask Sunil to improve his patch.
>
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150576233031387&w=2
>

Ah, did not see that. Somebody added me to a thread last week about this and I
just got around to making a fix now, I will jump on to that thread thanks.

Regards,
Dave