Re: [PATCH v2 00/40] tracing: Inter-event (e.g. latency) support
From: Tom Zanussi
Date: Tue Sep 19 2017 - 14:44:54 EST
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 12:31 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:57:12 -0500
> Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > This is V2 of the inter-event tracing patchset.
> Hi Tom,
> I was wondering if you had a v3 ready? I would like to get it into the
> next merge window, but I would also like it to be in linux-next early,
> which means we need the next version rather soon (hopefully that will
> be the last version).
Yeah, it's almost ready. At this point, I've addressed all the comments
- PATCH v2 25/40] tracing: Add support for dynamic tracepoints
which I need to do a little bit of research on to figure out what
exactly I need to do there.
I was also kind of looking for a couple patches from you to fold in
which you had mentioned you were going to send for:
- [PATCH v2 35/40] tracing: Reverse the order event_mutex/trace_types_lock are taken
- [PATCH v2 40/40] tracing: Add trace_event_buffer_reserve() variant that allows recursion
I've been using the trace_recursive_lock() patch you posted in place of
the latter and it's working fine. :-)
> -- Steve