Re: [PATCH] ratelimit: use deferred printk() version

From: Petr Mladek
Date: Mon Oct 02 2017 - 05:30:03 EST


On Fri 2017-09-29 13:55:46, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (Cc-ing Andrew lkml.kernel.org/r/20170928120405.18273-1-sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx )
>
> On (09/28/17 21:13), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > (Cc-ing Sasha)
> >
> > On (09/28/17 21:04), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > [..]
> > > : process 9121 (trinity-c78) no longer affine to cpu8
> > > : smpboot: CPU 8 is now offline
> > >
> > > Fixes: 6b1d174b0c27b ("ratelimit: extend to print suppressed messages on release")
> > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reported-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>

The change looks reasonable to me. Thanks a lot for digging into the
reported problem. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>

> a quick question, who is going to pick it up? or shall we ask Andrew?

I see that Andrew already took it. Thanks!

Best Regards,
Petr