Re: [PATCH 2/2] kprobes: propagate error from disarm_kprobe_ftrace()

From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Thu Oct 05 2017 - 02:28:13 EST


On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 21:14:14 +0200
Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Improve error handling when disarming ftrace-based kprobes. Like with
> arm_kprobe_ftrace(), propagate any errors from disarm_kprobe_ftrace() so
> that we do not disable/unregister kprobes that are still armed. In other
> words, unregister_kprobe() and disable_kprobe() should not report success
> if the kprobe could not be disarmed.
>
> disarm_all_kprobes() keeps its current behavior and attempts to
> disarm all kprobes. It returns the last encountered error and gives a
> warning if not all kprobes could be disarmed.
>
> This patch is based on Petr Mladek's original patchset (patches 2 and 3)
> back in 2015, which improved kprobes error handling, found here:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/26/452
>
> However, further work on this had been paused since then and the patches
> were not upstreamed.
>

OK, this looks good to me :)

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

> Based-on-patches-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/kprobes.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 6e889be0d93c..2e9edf646ae3 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1003,23 +1003,27 @@ static int arm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p)
> }
>
> /* Caller must lock kprobe_mutex */
> -static void disarm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p)
> +static int disarm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> - kprobe_ftrace_enabled--;
> - if (kprobe_ftrace_enabled == 0) {
> + if (kprobe_ftrace_enabled == 1) {
> ret = unregister_ftrace_function(&kprobe_ftrace_ops);
> - WARN(ret < 0, "Failed to init kprobe-ftrace (%d)\n", ret);
> + if (WARN(ret < 0, "Failed to unregister kprobe-ftrace (%d)\n", ret))
> + return ret;
> }
> +
> + kprobe_ftrace_enabled--;
> +
> ret = ftrace_set_filter_ip(&kprobe_ftrace_ops,
> (unsigned long)p->addr, 1, 0);
> WARN(ret < 0, "Failed to disarm kprobe-ftrace at %p (%d)\n", p->addr, ret);
> + return ret;
> }
> #else /* !CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE */
> #define prepare_kprobe(p) arch_prepare_kprobe(p)
> #define arm_kprobe_ftrace(p) (0)
> -#define disarm_kprobe_ftrace(p) do {} while (0)
> +#define disarm_kprobe_ftrace(p) (0)
> #endif
>
> /* Arm a kprobe with text_mutex */
> @@ -1038,18 +1042,18 @@ static int arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp)
> }
>
> /* Disarm a kprobe with text_mutex */
> -static void disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp, bool reopt)
> +static int disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp, bool reopt)
> {
> - if (unlikely(kprobe_ftrace(kp))) {
> - disarm_kprobe_ftrace(kp);
> - return;
> - }
> + if (unlikely(kprobe_ftrace(kp)))
> + return disarm_kprobe_ftrace(kp);
>
> cpus_read_lock();
> mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
> __disarm_kprobe(kp, reopt);
> mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
> cpus_read_unlock();
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1627,11 +1631,12 @@ static int aggr_kprobe_disabled(struct kprobe *ap)
> static struct kprobe *__disable_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> struct kprobe *orig_p;
> + int ret;
>
> /* Get an original kprobe for return */
> orig_p = __get_valid_kprobe(p);
> if (unlikely(orig_p == NULL))
> - return NULL;
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> if (!kprobe_disabled(p)) {
> /* Disable probe if it is a child probe */
> @@ -1645,8 +1650,13 @@ static struct kprobe *__disable_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> * should have already been disarmed, so
> * skip unneed disarming process.
> */
> - if (!kprobes_all_disarmed)
> - disarm_kprobe(orig_p, true);
> + if (!kprobes_all_disarmed) {
> + ret = disarm_kprobe(orig_p, true);
> + if (ret) {
> + p->flags &= ~KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> + }
> + }
> orig_p->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
> }
> }
> @@ -1663,8 +1673,8 @@ static int __unregister_kprobe_top(struct kprobe *p)
>
> /* Disable kprobe. This will disarm it if needed. */
> ap = __disable_kprobe(p);
> - if (ap == NULL)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (IS_ERR(ap))
> + return PTR_ERR(ap);
>
> if (ap == p)
> /*
> @@ -2095,12 +2105,14 @@ static void kill_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> int disable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> + struct kprobe *p;
>
> mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
>
> /* Disable this kprobe */
> - if (__disable_kprobe(kp) == NULL)
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> + p = __disable_kprobe(kp);
> + if (IS_ERR(p))
> + ret = PTR_ERR(p);
>
> mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
> return ret;
> @@ -2470,34 +2482,48 @@ static int arm_all_kprobes(void)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void disarm_all_kprobes(void)
> +static int disarm_all_kprobes(void)
> {
> struct hlist_head *head;
> struct kprobe *p;
> - unsigned int i;
> + unsigned int i, errors = 0;
> + int err, ret = 0;
>
> mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
>
> /* If kprobes are already disarmed, just return */
> if (kprobes_all_disarmed) {
> mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
> - return;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> kprobes_all_disarmed = true;
> - printk(KERN_INFO "Kprobes globally disabled\n");
>
> for (i = 0; i < KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
> head = &kprobe_table[i];
> + /* Disarm all kprobes on a best-effort basis */
> hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(p, head, hlist) {
> - if (!arch_trampoline_kprobe(p) && !kprobe_disabled(p))
> - disarm_kprobe(p, false);
> + if (!arch_trampoline_kprobe(p) && !kprobe_disabled(p)) {
> + err = disarm_kprobe(p, false);
> + if (err) {
> + errors++;
> + ret = err;
> + }
> + }
> }
> }
> +
> + if (errors)
> + pr_warn("Kprobes globally disabled, but failed to disarm %d kprobes\n", errors);
> + else
> + pr_info("Kprobes globally disabled\n");
> +
> mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
>
> /* Wait for disarming all kprobes by optimizer */
> wait_for_kprobe_optimizer();
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2540,7 +2566,7 @@ static ssize_t write_enabled_file_bool(struct file *file,
> case 'n':
> case 'N':
> case '0':
> - disarm_all_kprobes();
> + ret = disarm_all_kprobes();
> break;
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> --
> 2.13.6
>


--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>