Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] mmc: mediatek: add pad_tune0 support

From: Julien Thierry
Date: Tue Oct 10 2017 - 12:57:41 EST


Hi,

On 10/10/17 10:30, Chaotian Jing wrote:
from mt2701, the register of PAD_TUNE has been phased out,
while there is a new register of PAD_TUNE0

Signed-off-by: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
index ab2fbbb..0dc45b3 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
#define MSDC_PATCH_BIT 0xb0
#define MSDC_PATCH_BIT1 0xb4
#define MSDC_PAD_TUNE 0xec
+#define MSDC_PAD_TUNE0 0xf0
#define PAD_DS_TUNE 0x188
#define PAD_CMD_TUNE 0x18c
#define EMMC50_CFG0 0x208
@@ -301,6 +302,7 @@ struct msdc_save_para {
struct mtk_mmc_compatible {
u8 clk_div_bits;
bool hs400_tune; /* only used for MT8173 */
+ bool pad_tune0;

You only use this to decide whether to use MDSC_PAD_TUNE or MSDC_PAD_TUNE0 as tune regs.

Couldn't this field directly be a 'u32' that is either MDSC_PAD_TUNE or MDSC_PAD_TUNE0 rather than a bool?

};
struct msdc_tune_para {
@@ -362,21 +364,25 @@ struct msdc_host {
static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8135_compat = {
.clk_div_bits = 8,
.hs400_tune = false,
+ .pad_tune0 = false,

and here we could have (field could be renamed accordingly of course):

.pad_tune0 = MDSC_PAD_TUNE,

};
static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8173_compat = {
.clk_div_bits = 8,
.hs400_tune = true,
+ .pad_tune0 = false,
};
static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt2701_compat = {
.clk_div_bits = 12,
.hs400_tune = false,
+ .pad_tune0 = true,

here:
.pad_tune0 = MDSC_PAD_TUNE0,

};
static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt2712_compat = {
.clk_div_bits = 12,
.hs400_tune = false,
+ .pad_tune0 = true,
};
static const struct of_device_id msdc_of_ids[] = {
@@ -581,6 +587,10 @@ static void msdc_set_mclk(struct msdc_host *host, unsigned char timing, u32 hz)
u32 flags;
u32 div;
u32 sclk;
+ u32 tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE;
+
+ if (host->dev_comp->pad_tune0)
+ tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE0;

And this would not be needed here nor in the other functions, it could just be replaced by host->dev_comp->pad_tune0.

Thanks,

--
Julien Thierry