Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci/layerscape: change the default error response behavior

From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Wed Oct 11 2017 - 15:41:37 EST


On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 03:25:22PM +0800, Zhiqiang Hou wrote:
> From: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@xxxxxxx>
>
> By default, when the PCIe controller experiences an erroneous
> completion from an external completer for its outbound non-posted
> request, it always sends an OKAY response to the device's internal
> AXI slave system interface. However, such default system error
> response behavior cannot be used for other types of outbound
> non-posted requests. For example, the outbound memory read
> transaction requires an actual ERROR response, like UR completion
> or completion timeout. The patch is to fix it by forwarding
> the error response of the non-posted request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> index 3b01e309a55e..a647090c140e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
>
> /* PEX Internal Configuration Registers */
> #define PCIE_STRFMR1 0x71c /* Symbol Timer & Filter Mask Register1 */
> +#define PCIE_ABSERR 0x8d0 /* Bridge Slave Error Response Register */
> +#define PCIE_ABSERR_SETTING 0x9401 /* Forward error of non-posted request */
>
> #define PCIE_IATU_NUM 6
>
> @@ -54,6 +56,19 @@ struct ls_pcie {
>
> #define to_ls_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>
> +static int err_response_flag = 1;
> +
> +static int __init ls_pcie_param(char *p)
> +{
> + if (p && strncmp(p, "no-err-response", 15) == 0)
> + err_response_flag = 0;
> + else
> + err_response_flag = 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("ls_pcie", ls_pcie_param);

What's the point of this parameter? If it's for debugging, it's not
clear that we need it upstream. If it's for debugging and we *do*
need it upstream, there should be some sort of comment to that effect.

I assume you never expect an end user to need this parameter.

> static bool ls_pcie_is_bridge(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
> {
> struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> @@ -124,6 +139,14 @@ static int ls_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +/* Forward error response of outbound non-posted requests */
> +static void ls_pcie_fix_error_response(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> +
> + iowrite32(PCIE_ABSERR_SETTING, pci->dbi_base + PCIE_ABSERR);
> +}
> +
> static int ls_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> {
> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> @@ -135,6 +158,8 @@ static int ls_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> * dw_pcie_setup_rc() will reconfigure the outbound windows.
> */
> ls_pcie_disable_outbound_atus(pcie);
> + if (err_response_flag)
> + ls_pcie_fix_error_response(pcie);
>
> dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> ls_pcie_clear_multifunction(pcie);
> --
> 2.14.1
>