Re: [PATCH 01/10] PCI: dwc: use DMA-API for allocating MSI data

From: Niklas Cassel
Date: Mon Oct 16 2017 - 08:11:24 EST


On 10/13/2017 06:47 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Friday, October 13, 2017 12:09 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
>>
>> Since it is a PCIe endpoint device, rather than the CPU, that is supposed
>> to write to this location, the proper way to get the address to this this
>> location is really to use the DMA API, rather than virt_to_phys.
>>
>> Using virt_to_phys might work on some systems, but by using the DMA API,
>> we know that it will work on all systems.
>>
>> This is essentially the same thing as allocating a buffer in a driver,
>> to which the endpoint will write to. To do this, we use the DMA API.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 3 ++-
>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
>> b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
>> index 81e2157a7cfb..f6d152ea2a03 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
>> @@ -83,16 +83,25 @@ irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>
>> void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>> {
>> + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
>> + struct device *dev = pci->dev;
>> + struct page *page;
>> u64 msi_target;
>>
>> - pp->msi_data = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 0);
>> - msi_target = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data);
>> + page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA32);
>> + pp->msi_data = dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, PAGE_SIZE,
>> DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>> + if (dma_mapping_error(dev, pp->msi_data)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to map msi data\n");
>> + __free_page(page);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + msi_target = (u64)pp->msi_data;
>>
>> /* program the msi_data */
>> dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_ADDR_LO, 4,
>> - (u32)(msi_target & 0xffffffff));
>> + lower_32_bits(msi_target));
>> dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_ADDR_HI, 4,
>> - (u32)(msi_target >> 32 & 0xffffffff));
>> + upper_32_bits(msi_target));
>> }
>>
>> static void dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
>> @@ -187,10 +196,10 @@ static void dw_msi_setup_msg(struct pcie_port *pp,
>> unsigned int irq, u32 pos)
>> if (pp->ops->get_msi_addr)
>> msi_target = pp->ops->get_msi_addr(pp);
>> else
>> - msi_target = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data);
>> + msi_target = (u64)pp->msi_data;
>>
>> - msg.address_lo = (u32)(msi_target & 0xffffffff);
>> - msg.address_hi = (u32)(msi_target >> 32 & 0xffffffff);
>> + msg.address_lo = lower_32_bits(msi_target);
>> + msg.address_hi = upper_32_bits(msi_target);
>>
>> if (pp->ops->get_msi_data)
>> msg.data = pp->ops->get_msi_data(pp, pos);
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-
>> designware.h
>> index e5d9d77b778e..547352a317f8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>> #include <linux/irq.h>
>> #include <linux/msi.h>
>> #include <linux/pci.h>
>> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>
> If possible, please add this header in alphabetical order.

Absolutely, I will send a V2 series as soon as I get some
review comments on any of the other patches in the series.


Regards,
Niklas


>
> Best regards,
> Jingoo Han
>
>>
>> #include <linux/pci-epc.h>
>> #include <linux/pci-epf.h>
>> @@ -168,7 +169,7 @@ struct pcie_port {
>> const struct dw_pcie_host_ops *ops;
>> int msi_irq;
>> struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
>> - unsigned long msi_data;
>> + dma_addr_t msi_data;
>> DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS);
>> };
>>
>> --
>> 2.11.0
>
>