[PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: VMX: Don't advertise EPT switching if EPT itself is not exposed

[Wanpeng Li]

From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxx>

I can use vmxcap tool to observe "EPTP Switching   yes" even if EPT is not 
exposed to L1.

EPT switching is advertised unconditionally since it is emulated, however, 
it can be treated as an extended feature for EPT and it should not be 
advertised if EPT itself is not exposed. This patch fixes it.

Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Radim KrÄmÃÅ <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v1 -> v2:
 * don't advertise "EPT VM Functions" in secondary processor-based VM-execution 
   controls if we don't actually support any VM Functions.

 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index c460b0b..a6861ca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -2842,8 +2842,12 @@ static void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 		 * Advertise EPTP switching unconditionally
 		 * since we emulate it
 		 */
-		vmx->nested.nested_vmx_vmfunc_controls =
-			VMX_VMFUNC_EPTP_SWITCHING;
+		if (enable_ept) {
+			vmx->nested.nested_vmx_vmfunc_controls =
+				VMX_VMFUNC_EPTP_SWITCHING;
+		} else
+			vmx->nested.nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high &=
+				~SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VMFUNC;
 	}
 
 	/*
-- 
2.7.4