Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: Fix radio LED detection

[Jonathan Woithe]

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 01:21:50PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Micha?? K??pie?? <kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Micha?? K??pie?? <kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Radio LED detection method implemented in commit 4f62568c1fcf
> >> > ("fujitsu-laptop: Support radio LED") turned out to be incorrect as it
> >> > causes a radio LED to be erroneously detected on a Fujitsu Lifebook E751
> >> > which has a slide switch (and thus no radio LED).  Use bit 17 of
> >> > flags_supported (the value returned by method S000 of ACPI device
> >> > FUJ02E3) to determine whether a radio LED is present as it seems to be a
> >> > more reliable indicator, based on comparing DSDT tables of four Fujitsu
> >> > Lifebook models (E744, E751, S7110, S8420).
> >> >
> >>
> >> Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks!
> >
> > I forgot that this patch can also be tagged with:
> >
> > Fixes: 4f62568c1fcf ("fujitsu-laptop: Support radio LED")
> 
> Added.
> 
> Do you consider this an important fix? We are at -rc7 now, I'm not
> sure it's so critical. Tell me if you consider otherwise.

I agree - from my perspective I wouldn't have thought it so critical as to
push it out this late in the development cycle.  It's not a regression as
such and is largely cosmetic.  Others may argue differently though.

BTW, it looks like you may have missed my Reviewed-by tag on this patch,
sent on 25 Oct.  There was also a Tested-by added by Heinrich Siebmanns on
the same day:

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Heinrich Siebmanns <harv@xxxxxx>

Or perhaps such peripheral tags aren't carried forward on patches like this,
in which case it's a moot point.

Regards
  jonathan