Re: [PATCH 6/9] usb: host: isp1362-hcd: mark expected switch fall-through

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

Quoting Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

[..]
> > Sure thing.
> >
> > Just some questions about the process to follow:
> >
> > Should I send a v2 replying to this particular thread only? like [PATCH v2
> > 6/9]
> > or should I send just a new patch separated from this patch series? I guess
> > this is the case.
>
> Brand new patch is fine, this is gone from my patch queue.
>
> > Some maintainers have told me that in cases where a particular patch in the
> > series needs an update, the complete patchset should be sent again.
> > But I think that depends on the functional impact the patch has over
> > the whole patchset.
>
> Yes, it all depends, the rest of these patches are already in my tree.

OK. I'll send a new patch shortly.

Thanks!
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva