Re: [PATCH v2] IB/ocrdma_hw: remove unnecessary code in ocrdma_mbx_dealloc_lkey

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

Quoting Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>:

> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 08:56:37AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > Quoting Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 08:45:17AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > > Check on return value and goto label mbx_err are unnecessary.
> > > >
> > > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1268780
> > > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > >  Remove assignment from "int status = -ENOMEM" as suggested by Leon
> > > > Romanovsky.
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/ocrdma/ocrdma_hw.c | 6 ++----
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Please use git send-email to send patches and not reply to the  
> > conversation.
> > >
> >
> > I'm using mutt.
> > What would be the advantage of using git send-email in this case?
>
> New mail headers, so it won't appear as Reply-To and will be presented
> correctly in mutt's threaded mode.

Oh I actually did that on purpose.

So the preferred way to do this is to send the vN of the patch as a  
reply to the first patch?
or as a new thread?

Thanks
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva