Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: imx6q: Add Variscite DART-MX6 Carrier-board support

From: Neil Armstrong
Date: Wed Nov 22 2017 - 05:52:02 EST


Hi Fabio,

On 21/11/2017 17:45, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> + gpio-keys {
>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + autorepeat;
>> +
>> + button@0 {
>
> If you build this with W=1 it will give you warnings about using a
> unit address without its corresponding reg field.
>
> You could just drop the @x.

Ok

>
>> + gpios = <&gpio4 26 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + linux,code = <KEY_BACK>;
>> + label = "Key Back";
>> + linux,input-type = <1>;
>> + debounce-interval = <100>;
>> + gpio-key,wakeup;
>> + };
>> +
>> + button@1 {
>> + gpios = <&gpio5 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + linux,code = <KEY_HOME>;
>> + label = "Key Home";
>> + linux,input-type = <1>;
>> + debounce-interval = <100>;
>> + gpio-key,wakeup;
>> + };
>> +
>> + button@2 {
>> + gpios = <&gpio4 25 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + linux,code = <KEY_MENU>;
>> + label = "Key Menu";
>> + linux,input-type = <1>;
>> + debounce-interval = <100>;
>> + gpio-key,wakeup;
>> + };
>> + };
>
>> + panel1: lvds-panel {
>> + compatible = "sgd,gktw70sdae4se", "panel-lvds";
>
> sgd,gktw70sdae4se is not defined anywhere.
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-lvds.txt says"
>
> "- compatible: Shall contain "panel-lvds" in addition to a mandatory
> panel-specific compatible string defined in individual panel bindings. The
> "panel-lvds" value shall never be used on its own."
>

Ok add vendor prefix and bindings.

>> + backlight = <&backlight_lvds>;
>> +
>> + width-mm = <153>;
>> + height-mm = <86>;
>> +
>> + label = "gktw70sdae4se";
>> +
>> + data-mapping = "jeida-18";
>> +
>> + panel-timing {
>> + clock-frequency = <32000000>;
>> + hactive = <800>;
>> + vactive = <480>;
>> + hback-porch = <39>;
>> + hfront-porch = <39>;
>> + vback-porch = <29>;
>> + vfront-porch = <13>;
>> + hsync-len = <47>;
>> + vsync-len = <2>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + port {
>> + panel_in: endpoint {
>> + remote-endpoint = <&lvds1_out>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + reg_usb_h1_vbus: regulator-usbh1vbus {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "usb_h1_vbus";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + gpio = <&gpio1 28 0>;
>
> It would be better to use:
> gpio = <&gpio1 28 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;

Ok

>
>
>> + enable-active-high;
>> + };
>> +
>> + reg_usb_otg_vbus: regulator-usbotgvbus {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "usb_otg_vbus";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + gpio = <&gpio4 15 0>;
>
> Same here.

Ok

>
>> + enable-active-high;
>> + };
>> +
>
>> +
>> +&fec {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + phy-mode = "rgmii";
>> + phy-reset-gpios = <&gpio1 25 0>;
>
> GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW please.

Ok

>
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +&hdmi {
>> + ddc-i2c-bus = <&i2c1>;
>> + status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&pcie {
>> + reset-gpio = <&gpio4 11 0>;
>
> GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW
>
>> + wake-up-gpio = <&gpio4 31 1>;
>
> This is not a valid property.
>
>> + disable-gpio = <&gpio5 5 0>;
>
> This is not a valid property.
>

I will drop pcie for now until I figure out the requirements for these 2 gpios.

Thanks,
Neil