Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/xen: supply rsdp address in boot params for pvh guests

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Dec 08 2017 - 02:22:30 EST



* Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> When booted via the special PVH entry save the RSDP address set in the
> boot information block in struct boot_params. This will enable Xen to
> locate the RSDP at an arbitrary address.
>
> Set the boot loader version to 2.14 (0x020e) replacing the wrong 0x0212
> which should have been 0x020c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> V2: set bootloader version to 2.14 (Roger Pau Monné)
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c
> index 436c4f003e17..036e3a5f284a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c
> @@ -68,9 +68,12 @@ static void __init init_pvh_bootparams(void)
> *
> * Version 2.12 supports Xen entry point but we will use default x86/PC
> * environment (i.e. hardware_subarch 0).
> + * The RSDP address is available from version 2.14 on.
> */
> - pvh_bootparams.hdr.version = 0x212;
> + pvh_bootparams.hdr.version = 0x20e;

While 0x212 was "obvious" to read but totally wrong, it would be less fragile and
more readable if the version was generated as something like:

pvh_bootparams.hdr.version = (2 << 8) | 14;

similar to how it's written in other cases:

> pvh_bootparams.hdr.type_of_loader = (9 << 4) | 0; /* Xen loader */

Also, shouldn't the 0x212 fix be a separate patch, Cc: stable? The bug appears to
have been introduced at around v4.12.

Thanks,

Ingo