Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:04:18 +0100
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > 
> > The above just seems wrong. local_irq_disable() should imply
> > local_bh_disable(), as it doesn't let softirqs run either.  
> 
> Where does local_irq_disable() imply this?

If it doesn't explicitly do so, it probably should. How can we have a
softirq execute when irqs are disabled?

-- Steve