RE: [PATCH] CIFS: SMBD: fix configurations with INFINIBAND=m

From: Long Li
Date: Tue Dec 19 2017 - 16:21:46 EST

Next message: Ulf Hansson: "[PATCH 0/3] phy: core: Re-work runtime PM deployment and fix an issue"
Previous message: Rao Shoaib: "Re: [PATCH] kfree_rcu() should use the new kfree_bulk() interface for freeing rcu structures"
In reply to: Jean Delvare: "Re: [PATCH] CIFS: SMBD: fix configurations with INFINIBAND=m"
Next in thread: Stefan Metzmacher: "Re: [PATCH] CIFS: SMBD: fix configurations with INFINIBAND=m"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> depends on CIFS && INFINIBAND
> + depends on CIFS=m || INFINIBAND=y

How about we change them to

depends on CIFS=m && INFINIBAND || CIFS=y && INFINIBAND=y

This makes it easy to read.

Next message: Ulf Hansson: "[PATCH 0/3] phy: core: Re-work runtime PM deployment and fix an issue"
Previous message: Rao Shoaib: "Re: [PATCH] kfree_rcu() should use the new kfree_bulk() interface for freeing rcu structures"
In reply to: Jean Delvare: "Re: [PATCH] CIFS: SMBD: fix configurations with INFINIBAND=m"
Next in thread: Stefan Metzmacher: "Re: [PATCH] CIFS: SMBD: fix configurations with INFINIBAND=m"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]