[PATCH 1/2] phy: rockchip-emmc: retry calpad busy trimming

From: Shawn Lin
Date: Mon Jan 01 2018 - 21:26:21 EST


It turns out that 5us isn't enough for all cases, so let's
retry some more times to wait for caldone.

Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
index f1b24f1..512a6ef 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
@@ -76,6 +76,10 @@
#define PHYCTRL_OTAPDLYSEL_MASK 0xf
#define PHYCTRL_OTAPDLYSEL_SHIFT 0x7

+#define PHYCTRL_IS_CALDONE(x) \
+ ((((x) >> PHYCTRL_CALDONE_SHIFT) & \
+ PHYCTRL_CALDONE_MASK) == PHYCTRL_CALDONE_DONE)
+
struct rockchip_emmc_phy {
unsigned int reg_offset;
struct regmap *reg_base;
@@ -160,15 +164,16 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power(struct phy *phy, bool on_off)
PHYCTRL_PDB_SHIFT));

/*
- * According to the user manual, it asks driver to
- * wait 5us for calpad busy trimming
+ * According to the user manual, it asks driver to wait 5us for
+ * calpad busy trimming. However it is documented that this value is
+ * PVT(A.K.A process,voltage and temperature) relevant, so some
+ * failure cases are found which indicates we should be more tolerant
+ * to calpad busy trimming.
*/
- udelay(5);
- regmap_read(rk_phy->reg_base,
- rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_STATUS,
- &caldone);
- caldone = (caldone >> PHYCTRL_CALDONE_SHIFT) & PHYCTRL_CALDONE_MASK;
- if (caldone != PHYCTRL_CALDONE_DONE) {
+ if (regmap_read_poll_timeout(rk_phy->reg_base,
+ rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_STATUS,
+ caldone, PHYCTRL_IS_CALDONE(caldone),
+ 5, 50)) {
pr_err("rockchip_emmc_phy_power: caldone timeout.\n");
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
--
1.9.1