Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/sun4i: hdmi: Check for unset best_parent in sun4i_tmds_determine_rate

From: Jonathan Liu
Date: Fri Jan 05 2018 - 06:08:40 EST


Hi Maxime,

On 5 January 2018 at 21:03, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 09:44:39AM +1100, Jonathan Liu wrote:
>> On 5 January 2018 at 06:56, Maxime Ripard
>> <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:12:25PM +1100, Jonathan Liu wrote:
>> >> We should check if the best match has been set before comparing it.
>> >>
>> >> Fixes: 9c5681011a0c ("drm/sun4i: Add HDMI support")
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_tmds_clk.c | 2 +-
>> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_tmds_clk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_tmds_clk.c
>> >> index dc332ea56f6c..4d235e5ea31c 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_tmds_clk.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_tmds_clk.c
>> >> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int sun4i_tmds_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>> >> goto out;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> - if (abs(rate - rounded / i) <
>> >> + if (!best_parent || abs(rate - rounded / i) <
>> >
>> > Why is that causing any issue?
>> >
>> > If best_parent is set to 0...
>> >
>> >> abs(rate - best_parent / best_div)) {
>> >
>> > ... the value returned here is going to be rate, which is going to be
>> > higher than the first part of the comparison meaning ...
>> >
>> >> best_parent = rounded;
>> >
>> > ... that best_parent is going to be set there.
>>
>> Consider the following:
>> rate = 83500000
>> rounded = ideal * 2
>>
>> It is possible that if "rounded = clk_hw_round_rate(parent, ideal)"
>> gives high enough values that the condition "abs(rate - rounded / i) <
>> abs(rate - best_parent / best_div)" is never met.
>>
>> Then you can end up with:
>> req->rate = 0
>> req->best_parent_rate = 0
>> req->best_parent_hw = ...
>>
>> Also, the sun4i_tmds_calc_divider function has a similar check.
>
> Ok. That explanation must be part of your commit log, or at least
> which problem you're trying to address and in which situation it will
> trigger.

Ok. I have added amended the commit message with explanation for v3.

Regards,
Jonathan