Re: [PATCH V4] cpufreq: intel_pstate: allow trace in passive mode

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Fri Jan 05 2018 - 17:52:31 EST


On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Doug Smythies <doug.smythies@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Allow use of the trace_pstate_sample trace function
> when the intel_pstate driver is in passive mode.
> Since the core_busy and scaled_busy fields are not
> used, and it might be desirable to know which path
> through the driver was used, either intel_cpufreq_target
> or intel_cpufreq_fast_switch, re-task the core_busy
> field as a flag indicator.
>
> The user can then use the intel_pstate_tracer.py utility
> to summarize and plot the trace.
>
> Sometimes, in passive mode, the driver is not called for
> many tens or even hundreds of seconds. The user
> needs to understand, and not be confused by, this limitation.

The description of the changes between different versions should go
under the Signed-off-by: tag, separated by an extra "---" from it.

Also please see a couple of cosmetic comments below.

> V4: Only execute the trace specific overhead code if trace
> is enabled. Suggested by Srinivas Pandruvada.
>
> V3: Move largely duplicate code to a subroutine.
> Suggested by Rafael J. Wysocki.
>
> V2: prepare for resend. Rebase to current kernel, 4.15-rc3.
> Signed-off-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index 93a0e88..53bb953 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -1943,13 +1943,40 @@ static int intel_cpufreq_verify_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void intel_cpufreq_trace(struct cpudata *cpu, int fast, int from)

Please use "bool" for "fast" and I'd call it "fast_switch".

> +{
> + struct sample *sample;
> + u64 time;
> +
> + time = ktime_get();

It is pointless to evaluate ktime_get() if
trace_pstate_sample_enabled() returns "false".

> + if (trace_pstate_sample_enabled()) {
> + if (intel_pstate_sample(cpu, time)) {

And the extra indentation here is not very useful, so I'd write it as

if (!trace_pstate_sample_enabled())
return;

if (!intel_pstate_sample(cpu, ktime_get()))
return;

(note that you don't need the "time" variable any more with this).

> + sample = &cpu->sample;
> + /* In passvie mode the trace core_busy field is

"passive" (typo)

> + * re-assigned to indicate if the driver call
> + * was via the normal or fast switch path.
> + * The scaled_busy field is not used, set to 0.
> + */
> + trace_pstate_sample(fast,
> + 0,
> + from,
> + cpu->pstate.current_pstate,
> + sample->mperf,
> + sample->aperf,
> + sample->tsc,
> + get_avg_frequency(cpu),
> + fp_toint(cpu->iowait_boost * 100));
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int intel_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int target_freq,
> unsigned int relation)
> {
> struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu];
> struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> - int target_pstate;
> + int target_pstate, from;

I would call the new variable "old_pstate" or "orig_pstate" (so that
it is visibly clear that it represents a P-state).

>
> update_turbo_state();
>
> @@ -1969,12 +1996,14 @@ static int intel_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> break;
> }
> target_pstate = intel_pstate_prepare_request(cpu, target_pstate);
> + from = cpu->pstate.current_pstate;
> if (target_pstate != cpu->pstate.current_pstate) {
> cpu->pstate.current_pstate = target_pstate;
> wrmsrl_on_cpu(policy->cpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL,
> pstate_funcs.get_val(cpu, target_pstate));
> }
> freqs.new = target_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling;
> + intel_cpufreq_trace(cpu, 0, from);
> cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, &freqs, false);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1984,13 +2013,15 @@ static unsigned int intel_cpufreq_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int target_freq)
> {
> struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu];
> - int target_pstate;
> + int target_pstate, from;
>
> update_turbo_state();
>
> target_pstate = DIV_ROUND_UP(target_freq, cpu->pstate.scaling);
> target_pstate = intel_pstate_prepare_request(cpu, target_pstate);
> + from = cpu->pstate.current_pstate;
> intel_pstate_update_pstate(cpu, target_pstate);
> + intel_cpufreq_trace(cpu, 100, from);

Why are you passing 100 here? Anything different from 0 should
suffice, 1 in particular. And I'd pass "false" or "true" (they will
be converted to 0 and 1 for output anyway).

> return target_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling;
> }
>
> --

Thanks,
Rafael