Re: [PATCH] x86/retpoline: Avoid return buffer underflows on context switch
From:
Andi Kleen
Date:
Mon Jan 08 2018 - 17:54:24 EST
Next message:
Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH 2/8] blk-mq: protect completion path with RCU"
Previous message:
Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix circular locking dependency"
In reply to:
David Woodhouse: "Re: [PATCH] x86/retpoline: Avoid return buffer underflows on context switch"
Next in thread:
Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH] x86/retpoline: Avoid return buffer underflows on context switch"
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
>
We want this on vmexit too, right?
Yes. KVM patches are done separately.
-Andi
Next message:
Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH 2/8] blk-mq: protect completion path with RCU"
Previous message:
Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix circular locking dependency"
In reply to:
David Woodhouse: "Re: [PATCH] x86/retpoline: Avoid return buffer underflows on context switch"
Next in thread:
Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH] x86/retpoline: Avoid return buffer underflows on context switch"
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]