Re: Report long suspend times of NVMe devices (mostly firmware/device issues)

From: Martin K. Petersen
Date: Mon Jan 22 2018 - 16:31:57 EST

Next message: Serge Semin: "Re: [PATCH 00/14] MIPS: memblock: Switch arch code to NO_BOOTMEM"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [RFC PATCH 00/16] PTI support for x86-32"
In reply to: Keith Busch: "Re: Report long suspend times of NVMe devices (mostly firmware/device issues)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Paul,

> In my opinion anything longer than 200 ms should be reported similar to
> [2], and maybe worded like below.

There are many controllers out there that take double-digit seconds to
shut down.

--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering

Next message: Serge Semin: "Re: [PATCH 00/14] MIPS: memblock: Switch arch code to NO_BOOTMEM"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [RFC PATCH 00/16] PTI support for x86-32"
In reply to: Keith Busch: "Re: Report long suspend times of NVMe devices (mostly firmware/device issues)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]