Re: [Patch] vmbus: Simply hv_get_next_write_location() function

From: Stephen Hemminger
Date: Wed Jan 24 2018 - 11:37:16 EST


On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 14:21:30 +0800
lantianyu1986@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> From: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The "next" variable is redundant in hv_get_next_write_location().
> This patch is to remove it and return write_index directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c b/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c
> index 12eb8ca..71558e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -82,9 +82,7 @@ static void hv_signal_on_write(u32 old_write, struct vmbus_channel *channel)
> static inline u32
> hv_get_next_write_location(struct hv_ring_buffer_info *ring_info)
> {
> - u32 next = ring_info->ring_buffer->write_index;
> -
> - return next;
> + return ring_info->ring_buffer->write_index;
> }
>
> /* Set the next write location for the specified ring buffer. */

Looks good.
But let's go farther since function is only used in one location in the file
just eliminate it completely and do simple variable references.

The get/set functions in this file are unnecessary.

Better still it is possible to replace the lock based ring structure
with a compare-exchange solution.