Re: [PATCH BUGFIX 1/1] block, bfq: add requeue-request hook

From: Oleksandr Natalenko
Date: Tue Feb 06 2018 - 07:16:26 EST

Next message: Ming Lei: "[PATCH 0/5] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as possible"
Previous message: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH 1/8] ASoC: samsung: i2s: Ensure the RCLK rate is properly determined"
In reply to: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [PATCH BUGFIX 1/1] block, bfq: add requeue-request hook"
Next in thread: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [PATCH BUGFIX 1/1] block, bfq: add requeue-request hook"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi.

06.02.2018 12:57, Mike Galbraith wrote:

Not me. ÂBox seems to be fairly sure that it is bfq. Twice again box
went belly up on me in fairly short order with bfq, but seemed fine
with deadline. I'm currently running deadline again, and box again
seems solid, thought I won't say _is_ solid until it's been happily
trundling along with deadline for a quite a bit longer.

Sorry for the noise, but just to make it clear, are we talking about "deadline" or "mq-deadline" now?

Next message: Ming Lei: "[PATCH 0/5] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as possible"
Previous message: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH 1/8] ASoC: samsung: i2s: Ensure the RCLK rate is properly determined"
In reply to: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [PATCH BUGFIX 1/1] block, bfq: add requeue-request hook"
Next in thread: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [PATCH BUGFIX 1/1] block, bfq: add requeue-request hook"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]