Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v3 19/25] ASoC: qcom: q6afe: add support to MI2S ports

From: Rohit Kumar
Date: Wed Mar 07 2018 - 04:35:50 EST




On 2/13/2018 10:28 PM, srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6afe.h | 10 +++
sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6afe.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6afe.h | 10 +++
3 files changed, 131 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6afe.h b/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6afe.h
index e9004ee39f72..3cd862262369 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6afe.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6afe.h
@@ -16,6 +16,16 @@
#define SLIMBUS_4_TX 24
#define SLIMBUS_5_RX 25
#define SLIMBUS_5_TX 26
+#define QUATERNARY_MI2S_RX 34
+#define QUATERNARY_MI2S_TX 35
+#define SECONDARY_MI2S_RX 36
+#define SECONDARY_MI2S_TX 37
+#define TERTIARY_MI2S_RX 38
+#define TERTIARY_MI2S_TX 39
+#define PRIMARY_MI2S_RX 40
+#define PRIMARY_MI2S_TX 41
Can we assign ids to Primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary MI2S ports in sequence starting with Primary.
+#define SECONDARY_PCM_RX 42
+#define SECONDARY_PCM_TX 43
Why only SECONDARY_PCM_RX ? This is not required for MI2S right?
#define SLIMBUS_6_RX 45
#define SLIMBUS_6_TX 46

[..]