Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] phy: qcom-qmp: Enable pipe_clk before checking USB3 PHY_STATUS

From: Vivek Gautam
Date: Tue Mar 27 2018 - 02:56:22 EST




On 3/27/2018 10:37 AM, Manu Gautam wrote:
Hi Doug,


On 3/27/2018 9:56 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Manu

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:11 PM, Manu Gautam <mgautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
QMP PHY for USB mode requires pipe_clk for calibration and PLL lock
to take place. This clock is output from PHY to GCC clock_ctl and then
fed back to QMP PHY and is available from PHY only after PHY is reset
and initialized, hence it can't be enabled too early in initialization
sequence.

Signed-off-by: Manu Gautam <mgautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
So it's now new with this patch, but it's more obvious with this
patch. It seems like "UFS/PCIE" is kinda broken w/ respect to how it
controls its clock. Specifically:

* If you init the PHY but don't power it on, then you "exit" the PHY:
you'll disable/unprepare "pipe_clk" even though you never
prepare/enabled it.

* If you init the PHY, power it on, power it off, power it on, and
exit the PHY: you'll leave the clock prepared one extra time.

Specifically I'd expect: for UFS/PCIE the disable/unprepare should be
symmetric with the enable/prepare and should be in "power off", not in
exit.

...or did I miss something?


Interestingly, your patch fixes this problem for USB3 (where init/exit
are now symmetric), but leaves the problem there for UFS/PCIE.

Thanks for review.
One of the reason why pipe_clk is disabled as part of phy_exit is that
halt_check from clk_disable reports error if called after PHY has been
powered down or phy_exit.
I believe that warning should be ignored in qcom gcc-clock driver
(for applicable platforms) by using BRANCH_HALT_DELAY as halt_check
for pipe_clk and performing clk_disable from power_off for UFS/PCIE.
UFS doesn't use PIPE clock.
But considering for PCIe, if we disable pipe clock when phy is still running, then
it shouldn't be a problem. We should also not see the halt warning as the gcc
driver should be able to just turn the gate off.
The reason why it will throw that error is when the parent clock to that gate
is gated, i.e. the pipe clock is not flowing on that branch.

Best regards
Vivek


I can implement that as separate patch once dependent gcc driver
patch(es) gets in. Would that be ok?

-Manu