Re: [tip:irq/core 12/13] drivers/irqchip/irq-vic.c:295:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_handle_irq'; did you mean 'vic_handle_irq'?

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 08:38:29 PDT (-0700), tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 22:27:36 PDT (-0700), tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > > The commits in tip right now are:
> > >
> > >   cc6c98485f8e ("RISC-V: Move to the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER handler")
> > >   caacdbf4aa56 ("genirq: Add CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER")
> > >
> > > I surely can revert them, but I don't see how they would break arm or
> > > anything else.
> >
> > If GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER is set via randconfig then set_handle_irq() is
> > pulled in from the generic code, which conflicts with the definitions in arm,
> > arm64, and openrisc.  The RISC-V commit depends on the genirq one.
>
> Two ways to fix that:
>
>  - Rename set_handle_irq() in tip:irq/core and then convert the rest of the
>    tree over. A few more files touched, but nothing harmful
>
>  - Make GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER depend on !IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER. That should
>    cure it as well

I have a patch set that does the second one, but it's done in a manner that 
assumes the partial patch set got merged.  Let me just send it out...