Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] locking: Document the semantics of spin_is_locked()

[David Howells]

Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Sorry, but I don't understand your objection: are you suggesting to add
> something like "Always return 0 on !SMP" to the comment?  what else?

Something like that, possibly along with a warning that this might not be what
you want.  You might actually want it to return true on !SMP, it depends on
what you're using it for.

David