Re: usercopy whitelist woe in scsi_sense_cache
From: Oleksandr Natalenko
Date: Wed Apr 04 2018 - 17:35:07 EST
04.04.2018 23:25, Kees Cook wrote:
Actually, I can trigger a BUG too:
[ 129.259213] usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from
object 'scsi_sense_cache' (offset 119, size 22)!
Wow, yeah, that's totally outside the slub object_size. How did you
trigger this? Just luck or something specific?
Just luck, I suppose. It usually comes after the first warning if you
wait long enough (maybe, a couple of extra minutes).
To give you an idea regarding variety of offsets, I've summarised kernel
log from the server:
$ sudo journalctl -kb | grep "Kernel memory exposure attempt detected" |
grep -oE 'offset [0-9]+, size [0-9]+' | sort | uniq -c
9 offset 107, size 22
6 offset 108, size 22
8 offset 109, size 22
7 offset 110, size 22
5 offset 111, size 22
5 offset 112, size 22
2 offset 113, size 22
2 offset 114, size 22
1 offset 115, size 22
1 offset 116, size 22
1 offset 119, size 22
1 offset 85, size 22
I'd really like to understand how the buffer position can be
changing... I'd expect that to break all kinds of things (i.e.
free()ing the slab later would break too...)
I haven't checked the code yet, but the first thing that comes to my
mind is some uninitialised variable. Just guessing here, though.
Thanks for the report! I hope someone more familiar with sg_io() can
help explain the changing buffer offset... :P
Hopefully, SCSI people are Cc'ed here properlyâ