Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: remove me as maintainer for I2C host drivers

[Joe Perches]

On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 18:42 +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-04-10 17:52, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> > 
> > > Hmm, I think you are ducking out from the i2c-mux-pinctrl driver as well.
> > > Was that the intent?
> > 
> > Oops, nope! Sorry, I just forgot about the demux (I think you mean that
> > one) driver and will create a seperate entry for it.
> 
> Right, I meant the demux...
> 
> > > 
> > > > +I2C SUBSYSTEM DRIVERS
> > > > +L:	linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > +W:	https://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/
> > > > +Q:	https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/
> > > > +T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git
> > > > +S:	Odd Fixes
> > > > +F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/
> > > > +F:	drivers/i2c/*/
> > > > +
> > > 
> > > And this includes all the other muxes, i.e. those that are "mine". Maybe
> > > not a problem, but what do I know?
> > 
> > Sorry again, I really didn't want to dump something on you or leave you
> > all alone with the muxes. I was just so focussed on the host drivers
> > that muxes simply slipped through my mind :( I can add myself to the
> > muxes section again, no problem. I'll let you decidei what you prefer,
> > both is fine for me. You are doing a great job there!
> 
> No no, you don't need to add yourself there. I understand the mux drivers,
> and it's pretty quiet, so no need for that. What I was worrying about was
> this "Odd Fixes" fallback entry needlessly covering the muxes when they
> are covered elsewhere.

If you want to exclude drivers/i2c/muxes from the
subsystem drivers block then you could add

X:	drivers/i2c/muxes/