Re: [patch V3 01/10] rslib: Add GFP aware init function

From: Kees Cook
Date: Tue Apr 24 2018 - 22:46:02 EST


On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2018 18:23:46 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> The rslib usage in dm/verity_fec is broken because init_rs() can nest in
>> GFP_NOIO mempool allocations as init_rs() is invoked from the mempool alloc
>> callback.
>>
>> Provide a variant which takes gfp_t flags as argument.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> include/linux/rslib.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> lib/reed_solomon/reed_solomon.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- a/include/linux/rslib.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/rslib.h
>> @@ -77,10 +77,30 @@ int decode_rs16(struct rs_control *rs, u
>> #endif
>>
>> /* Create or get a matching rs control structure */
>> -struct rs_control *init_rs(int symsize, int gfpoly, int fcr, int prim,
>> - int nroots);
>> +struct rs_control *init_rs_gfp(int symsize, int gfpoly, int fcr, int prim,
>> + int nroots, gfp_t gfp);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * init_rs - Create a RS control struct and initialize it
>> + * @symsize: the symbol size (number of bits)
>> + * @gfpoly: the extended Galois field generator polynomial coefficients,
>> + * with the 0th coefficient in the low order bit. The polynomial
>> + * must be primitive;
>> + * @fcr: the first consecutive root of the rs code generator polynomial
>> + * in index form
>> + * @prim: primitive element to generate polynomial roots
>> + * @nroots: RS code generator polynomial degree (number of roots)
>> + *
>> + * Allocations use GFP_KERNEL.
>> + */
>> +static inline struct rs_control *init_rs(int symsize, int gfpoly, int fcr,
>> + int prim, int nroots)
>> +{
>> + return init_rs_gfp(symsize, gfpoly, fcr, prim, nroots, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +}
>> +
>
> The version of this patch that Kees has committed to his kspp tree in linux-next has
>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> why not just
>
> #include <linux/types.h> /* for gpf_t */
> #include <linux/gpf.h> /* for GFP_KERNEL */
>
> ?

We could certainly switch to that. (Why doesn't gfp.h include types.h?)

-Kees


--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security